Zara Case Study Harvard Solution

HBR Case SolutionShould case study answer arbitrators determination be in case study solution opposite path, three alternative answers can be open concerning case study answer consequences to be drawn there from, based also upon case study solution parties claims before case study answer arbitrator:The arbitrator may invite case study solution parties to try and negotiate once again case study solution terms of a revised settlement based on his her findings. If such an attempt is unsuccessful, or in its absence, case study answer arbitrator may verify that only case study solution parties are entitled to proceed to case study answer revision of case study solution settlement, wherein case he she may either declare that case study answer latter is to proceed or may declare its termination should it be found that case study answer other party failed to act in good faith during case study solution negotiation phase, during which case compensation may moreover be presented to case study solution aggrieved party. 27The arbitrator may proceed to verify case study solution manner during which case study solution terms of case study solution settlement may be revised as a way to conform to case study answer events goal of restoring case study answer contractual equilibrium and shall issue an award effectuating such a revision. While answers i and ii above are within case study answer arbitrators normal adjudicative powers, solution iii poses gentle complications regarding case study answer nature and extent of case study answer arbitrators intervention, due to the fact that an arbitrator forever lacks case study answer power to rewrite case study answer parties agreement. 28 It should also be added that case study solution trend evidenced by arbitral awards is rather in favour of a restrictive view of case study solution arbitrators powers to conform a freelance, even a long run one, in case of a transformation of cases. 29 case study answer arbitration clause should therefore expressly confer case study answer power to conform case study answer agreement and examine case study answer manner for its exercise in addition to case study answer limits of case study answer arbitrators authority in that regard.